Evidential Interpretation Of Medicolegal Opinion: Pardgim Shift From Medical To Legal?

Authors

  • Jani C B Professor and Head, Forensic Medicine Department, SAL Institute of Medical Sciences, Ahmedabad-60 (Gujarat).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2025.23.1.1

Keywords:

Criminal Justice System, Evidence, Interpretation

Abstract

The criminal justice system provides remedies for offences, as defined by the law  of the land. So far as “offences against human” in India are concerned, the erstwhile  Indian Penal Code (IPC), Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), and Indian Evidence  Act (IEA)were major laws that witnessed many amendments. The BHARATIYA  NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 (BNS) completely repealed the former IPC last year.  Criminal investigation agencies rely mainly on examination of a person- living  or dead–as the case may be and subsequently report of such examination by the  Registered Medical Practitioner (RMP) / board of experts form a critical base for  further investigations and legal recourse. Once the case is committed for trial,  the opinion of RMP and analysis reports of various samples collected are also of  immense importance for the prosecution side.  

The medicolegal opinion by RMP is based on one’s personal knowledge of “Forensic  Medicine & Toxicology” coupled with practical exposure to such cases.  The recent biomedical and legal literature permits one to conclude that the  evidential interpretation of such opinion/s is more legal than that based on medical  science. With due respect to all concerned stakeholders of the Criminal Justice  Delivery System”, an attempt has been made to review the present scenario and  contemplate solutions, if desired. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Vij, K. (2011). Textbook of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology – Principles & Practices (5th ed., Chapter 1: Introduction to Forensic Medicine and Indian Legal System, p. 4). Elsevier, New Delhi.

Legal Cases

Civil Appeal No. 5845 of 2009, Suchita Srivastava and Anr. vs. Chandigarh Administration, Supreme Court of India, decided on 28 August 2009, before Hon’ble Mr. K.G. Balakrishnan (CJI), Dr. B.S. Chauhan, and Mr. P. Sathasivam.

XYZ v. State of Gujarat, 2024 SCC OnLine Guj 4042, Order dated 08 November 2024. Retrieved from https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/11/12/Gujarat-High-Court-Allows-Termination-Of-Pregnancy-At-24-Weeks-Of-Minor-Rape-Victim

Natthal v. State of U.P., 1993 JIC 696 [All].

Criminal Reference No. 6 of 2022, High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur, before Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath (Chief Justice) & Hon’ble Shri Justice Vishal Mishra, dated 11 September 2023.

Criminal Appeal No. 1366 of 1993 with Criminal Misc. Application No. 6099 of 1993, High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad.

Sagarmal Agrawal vs. Dr. R.K. Sharma, Appeal No. 72/2011, dated 08 October 2021, Rajasthan SCDRC, Circuit Bench, Kota.

Journal Articles

(2016). Software tool in digital radiographs for appearance & fusion of ossification centers at wrist joint. International Journal of Health Research and Medico Legal Practice, 2(1).

(2017). Carpals – The tiny markers of age estimation by digital radiography. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 39(1), Jan–Mar.

Government Guidelines / Acts

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. (2013). Guidelines & Protocols: Medico-legal care for survivors/victims of sexual violence (pp. 51–52). Government of India, Department of Health & Family Welfare, Hospital Division.

S.63 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, No. 45 of 2023 [25th December 2023].

Published

2025-06-24