Right To Parenthood- A Left Crevice in Surrogacy Regulation Act 2021: Re view

Authors

  • Aditi Gupta Postgraduate student, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India
  • Ashok Moondra Senior Professor and Head, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India
  • Sachin Kumar Meena Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2025.23.1.5

Keywords:

Surrogacy, Intending Couple, Right to Parenthood, Supreme Court

Abstract

Surrogacy refers to a practice whereby one woman bears and gives birth to a child  for an intended couple with the intention of handing over such a child to the intended  couple after birth. The right to parenthood, often referred to as the right to procreate  or reproductive rights, is a fundamental human right. It encompasses individuals’  ability to make decisions about having and raising children without undue interference  from the state or other entities. This right is rooted in various legal and constitutional  principles including the right to privacy, family autonomy, and personal liberty. In  this case, we have tried to scrutinize the laws of the surrogacy act and how they  impacted the life of an intending couple. The Supreme Court has protected the right  of parenthood of a woman suffering from a rare medical condition by staying the  operation of a law that threatened to wreck her hopes to become a mother through  surrogacy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Parliament of India. (2021). The Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021. https://www.indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/17046/1/A2021-47.pdf

Pandey, M., Jain, S., Tripathi, N., Sharma, Y., Tripathi, N., Sukhija, H., Sagar, M., Neelam Singh, Pawan, A., Srivastava, Singh, A. P., Mohini Priya, Aishwarya Bhati, Makker, G. S., Nair, R., Paul, K., Pandey, M., Rashtravara, C., Ameyavikrama Thanvi, & Ivan. (2023). Record of proceedings – Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 756/2022 - Arun Muthuvel v. Union of India & Ors. Supreme Court of India. https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2022/26590/26590_2022_15_49_47530_Order_09-Oct-2023.pdf

Rajagopal, K. (2023, October 26). Supreme Court allows surrogacy, strikes down rule banning use of donor gametes. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-upholds-womans-right-to-be-a-parent-through-surrogacy/article

Tamalapakula, S. (n.d.). Caste, patriarchy and the surrogacy market in India. The News Minute. https://www.thenewsminute.com/news/caste-patriarchy-and-surrogacy-market-india-95006

Das, P. (2021, August 11). Jan Balaz v. Anand Municipality. The Legal Lama. https://thelegallamablog.wixsite.com/website/post/jan-balaz-v-anand-municipality

Madras High Court of India. (n.d.). K. Kalaiselvi v. Chennai Port Trust, 4 March 2013 – Compendium of Court Decisions. https://compendium.itcilo.org/en/compendium-decisions/madras-high-court-of-india-k-kalaiselvi-v-chennai-port-trust-4-march-2013

Supreme Court of India. (2008). Baby Manji Yamada v. Union of India, (2008) 13 SCC 518.

Published

2025-06-24