Comparative life parameters of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) reared on chickpea under laboratory conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/jefa.2025.20.2.22Keywords:
Chickpea, Helicoverpa armigera, biology, growth indexAbstract
The biology of H. armigera reared on organically and traditionally grown chickpea showed maximum and minimum egg hatching of 89.82 and 80.59 per cent, respectively. The mean pre-oviposition, oviposition and post oviposition periods of H. armigera female was (2.92±0.86, 6.32±1.24 and 1.72±1.20) days on organically grown chickpea, while (2.48±0.50, 5.32±1.21 and 1.64±1.18) days on traditionally grown chickpea. The maximum mean fecundity was 220.20 ± 17.63 on organically grown chickpea and minimum (186.60±10.68) on traditionally grown chickpea. The incubation period on traditionally grown chickpea (3.84±0.84 days) and (4.44 ± 1.08) days on organically grown chickpea. The minimum larval developmental period of 24.92± 2.23 days was noted on traditionally grown chickpea, whereas, it was maximum (25.92 ± 2.79 days) on organically grown chickpea. Similarly, the length and breadth of pre-pupae (25.49±1.72 and 6.12±0.31 mm) and pupae (20.53±2.12 and 6.73±0.36 mm for male and 22.86 ± 3.40 and 7.15 ± 0.28 for female) was maximum on organically grown chickpea and minimum of (25.43±1.97 and 6.08±0.36 mm) for pre-pupa, (18.95±1.83 and 6.47±0.45 mm) for male pupa and (22.81 ± 3.18 and 7.08 ± 0.32 mm) for female pupa was measured on traditionally grown chickpea. The minimum pre-pupal (2.88 ± 1.12 days) and pupal periods (8.00 ± 0.81 and 9.08 ± 1.35 days for male and female) were recorded on traditionally grown chickpea, while maximum (2.96 ± 1.05 days pre-pupal and 8.60 ± 1.11 and 9.6 ± 1.47 days male and female pupal periods) on organically grown chickpea. Among two hosts the longevity of male and female was recorded as maximum with a mean of (6.56±1.08 and 10.04±1.42 days) on organically grown chickpea and minimum with a mean of (5.68 ± 1.14 and 10.36 ± 1.18 days), respectively on traditionally grown chickpea. The sex ratio of male to female was 1: 0.89 and 1: 0.78 on organically and traditionally grown chickpea. On the basis of growth index, organically grown chickpea (3.55) was the most preferred host over traditionally grown chickpea (3.33) for H. armigera.
Downloads
References
Bhatt, N. J., & Patel, R. K. (2001). Biology of chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera Hub. Indian Journal of Entomology, 63, 255–259.
Chauhan, N. N. (2012). Biology and management of ear head worm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) in summer pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.). (M.Sc. thesis). Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University, Sardarkrushinagar.
Deepa, M., & Srivastava, C. P. (2010). Biological characteristics of Helicoverpa armigera. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 18, 370–372.
Ghadiya, H. A., Borad, P. K., & Bhut, J. B. (2014). Bionomics and evaluation of different biopesticides against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) Hardwick infesting groundnut. The Bioscan, 9, 23–26.
Gowda, D. K. S., Patil, B. V., & Yelshetty, S. (2007). Performance of different sprayers against gram pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea. Karnataka Journal of Agriculture Science, 20, 261–264.
Kumar, A., Mishra, M., & Sadguru, P. (2013). Biology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on tomato in Tarai region of Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Experimental Zoology India, 16, 101–104.
Kumar, P., Mishra, D. N., Singh, D. V., Kumar, S., Ravi Shanker, & Aditya Patel. (2022). Biology of pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on chickpea leaves and pods under laboratory conditions. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 14, 603–607.
ALi, M. R., Monowara, Y., Alam, M. M., Tahmina, A., & Hoque, M. A. (2009). Eco-friendly management of tomato fruit borer. International Journal Sustainable Agricultural Technology, 5, 39–44.
Parmar, K. D. (2006). Bio-ecology and management of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) Hardwick infesting okra. (M.Sc. thesis). Anand Agricultural University, Anand, pp. 53–59.
Patel, R. S., Patel, K. A., Patil, K. S., & Toke, N. R. (2011). Biology of Helicoverpa armigera Hub. on rose in laboratory condition. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystem, 17, 144–148.
Rabari, G. N., Pareek, A., & Patel, B. R. (2017). Comparative biology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) reared on different hosts. International Journal Pure Applied Bioscience, 5, 849–856.
Sharma, K. C., Bhardwaj, S. C., & Sharma, G. (2011). Systematic studies, life history and infestation by Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on tomato in semi-arid region of Rajasthan. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 3, 52–56.
Sharma, V. G., Kumar, S., & Srinivas, G. (2019). Biology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on tomato in South Gujarat. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies, 7, 532–537.
Shivanna, B. K., Girish, M. R., Shruthi, H., Shilpa, M. E., Vikas, H. M., Mallikarjuna, G. B., Harishbabu, S., Shivanna, S., & Basavaraj, M. K. (2012). Bioecology and management of budworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on FCV tobacco. International Journal of Science in Nature, 3, 892–899.
Srivastava, B. K. (1959). Growth potential of Lyphygma exigua winter food plants. Madras Agricultural Journal, 46, 255–259.
Thakor, S. B., & Patel, I. S. (2008). Biology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata L.). Pest Management and Economic Zoology, 16, 15–18.
Thakor, S. B., Patel, I. S., & Jakhar, B. L. (2009). Biology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.) on cabbage, Brassica oleracea var. capitata L. Pestology, 33, 20–35.
Yadav, S. S., Singh, B., Kumar, A., & Satya, V. (2015). Laboratory evaluation of host plant suitability for Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on growth and development. Annals of Biology, 4, 2044–2051.
Anonymous. (2023a). Annual Report. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Agricultural Statistics Division, Directorate of Agriculture and Co-operation and Farmer’s Welfare.
Anonymous. (2023b). Crop-wise area, production and productivity of pulses from 2010–11 to 2020–21. DPD, GoI, Bhopal. Retrieved from https://dpd.gov.in/2.%20Cropwise%20APY%20of%20Pulses%20(2021-22%20to%202022-23).pdf