Participatory Technology Development (PTD) in Agronomic Research and Extension

Authors

  • Sanjay Lilhare Department of Agronomy, AKS University, Sherganj, Satna - 485001 (M.P.), India
  • Pratik Sanodiya Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, BHU, Varanasi (U.P.) - 221005

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/jes.2024.40.1.4

Keywords:

Participatory tech nology development, agronomy, extension, farmer field schools, sustainable agriculture, innova tion adoption

Abstract

Participatory Technology Development (PTD) has emerged as a farmer-centred  approach in agronomic research and extension, shifting from conventional top-down  technology transfer models to collaborative innovation systems. PTD emphasizes  joint experimentation, mutual learning, and integration of local knowledge with  scientific expertise to generate site-specific and sustainable agronomic solutions.  In crop production, PTD has been successfully applied in nutrient management,  improving soil fertility, enhancing water-use efficiency, managing pests and  weeds, and selecting varieties. Extension strategies such as Farmer Field Schools,  participatory rural appraisal, and farmer-led trials have proven effective in enhancing  technology adoption, building farmer capacity, and strengthening linkages between  research institutions and farming communities. Despite its benefits, PTD faces  challenges including institutional constraints, limited scalability, and the need for  adequate policy and financial support. Recent advancements in digital extension,  ICT tools, and multi-stakeholder platforms provide new opportunities to strengthen  participatory approaches in agronomy. This review highlights the principles,  applications, benefits, and limitations of PTD, emphasizing its role in developing  climate-resilient, context-specific, and sustainable agronomic practices. The findings  underline that PTD is not only a research methodology but also a transformative  extension strategy that empowers farmers, enhances adoption, and contributes to  sustainable agricultural development. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aker, J. C. (2011). Dial “A” for agriculture: A review of information and communication technologies for agricultural extension in developing countries. Agricultural Economics, 42(6), 631–647.

Braun, A., Jiggins, J., Röling, N., van den Berg, H., & Snijders, P. (2006). A global review of farmer field school experiences. FAO & IIRR.

Chambers, R. (1994). Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Challenges, potentials, and paradigm. World Development, 22(10), 1437–1454.

Chauhan, B. S., Mahajan, G., Sardana, V., Timsina, J., & Jat, M. L. (2018). Productivity and sustainability of integrated crop management practices: A participatory approach. Field Crops Research, 223, 1–12.

FAO. (2013). Climate-smart agriculture sourcebook. Food and Agriculture Organization.

Joshi, P. K., Bantilan, M. C., & Birthal, P. S. (2003). Impact of participatory varietal selection in semi-arid India: Adoption and yield gains. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58(3), 387–398.

Klerkx, L., & Rose, D. (2020). Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system innovation? Global Food Security, 24, 100347.

Klerkx, L., Aarts, N., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environments. Agricultural Systems, 126, 1–9.

Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2012). A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and Agriculture 4.0: New contributions and future directions. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91, 100318.

Leeuwis, C. (2004). Communication for rural innovation: Rethinking agricultural extension. Blackwell Science.

Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674.

Lipper, L., Thornton, P., Campbell, B. M., et al. (2014). Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nature Climate Change, 4, 1068–1072.

Norgaard, R. B. (1984). Coevolutionary development potential. Journal of Development Studies, 20(4), 457–486.

Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263.

Pretty, J., & Bharucha, Z. P. (2015). Integrated pest management for sustainable intensification of agriculture in Asia and Africa. Insects, 6(1), 152–182.

Rivera, W. M., & Qamar, M. K. (2003). Agricultural extension, rural development and the food security challenge. FAO.

Rivera, W. M., & Sulaiman, V. R. (2009). Extension: Object of reform, engine for innovation. Outlook on Agriculture, 38(3), 267–273.

Röling, N., & Engel, P. (1991). Facilitating sustainable agriculture: Participatory learning and knowledge networks. In Participatory Learning for Sustainable Agriculture.

Röling, N., & Jiggins, J. (1998). The ecological knowledge system. In Facilitating sustainable agriculture (pp. 283–311). Cambridge University Press.

Sanginga, P., Waters-Bayer, A., Kaaria, S., Njuki, J., & Wettasinha, C. (2009). Innovation Africa: Enriching farmers’ livelihoods. Earthscan.

Sharma, B., Singh, A., & Sharma, R. (2010). Participatory approach in water-saving irrigation techniques: Lessons from Philippines. Agricultural Water Management, 97(8), 1209–1215.

Sulaiman, R. V., & Davis, K. (2012). The ‘New Extensionist’: Roles, strategies, and capacities to strengthen extension and advisory services. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 18(4), 437–459.

van den Berg, H., & Jiggins, J. (2007). Investing in farmers – The impacts of farmer field schools in relation to integrated pest management. World Development, 35(4), 663–686.

Published

2025-10-28

How to Cite

Lilhare, S., & Sanodiya, P. (2025). Participatory Technology Development (PTD) in Agronomic Research and Extension . Journal of Extension Systems, 40(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.48165/jes.2024.40.1.4