Cost-Benefit Analysis of Library Automation Project: A Case Study of Rabindra Library, Assam University Silchar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Library Automation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Benefit-Cost Ratio, Library Finance, Library and Information ScienceAbstract
Analyzing the costs and benefits of a proposed project or program is an essential step in deciding whether or not to proceed with it, as is doing an after-the-fact evaluation to determine whether or not the project or program was a success. To entirely or partly automate their libraries, library, and information centers (LICs) are spending a significant amount of money. No LICs, however, undertake CBA before or after the implementation of library automation (LPA). Ex-post-facto cost-benefit analysis (CBA) was used to determine the costs and benefits of LPA. Moreover, Secondary materials like Rabindra Library's yearly reports and budget forecasts were utilized to supplement the original data collected via surveys and observations. MS-Excel application evaluates the collected data and shows it in tabular and graphical formats. The LAP cost at Rabindra Library was Rs. 34,431,820.00, but the advantages (both monetary and non-monetary) were worth Rs.2,52,93,798.00 for seven years of the study period. Sensitivity at a rate of minus five percent; minus three; plus three; five, and ten percent are included in the Benefit-Cost Ratio to show the possible variation in estimation. Improved services and improved administration of activities, employees, and resources are examples of how LAP has profited from the program due to the benefits to users like students, researchers, professors, and staff. LAP has also positively impacted managing libraries and providing effective services to users. The advantages of automating a university library outweigh the expense in the long run.
Downloads
References
A.T. Francis, M. Mahapatra. (1998). CALIBER-98, Ahmedabad, India: INFLIBNET Centre. 60-64.
Assam University Silchar. (2022, Feburary 27). Rabindra Library. Retrieved from Assam University Silchar: www.aus.ac.in/library
Ayre, L. B. (2009). Cost Comparison of Automated versus Manual Materials Handling Operations at.
Berghammer, D. (1996). A Cost Benefit analysis of an Automated Circulation System for a Small Public Library.
Byrd, Sam, Glenn Courson, Elizabeth Roderick, and Jean Marie Taylor (2001). "Cost/benefit analysis for digital library projects: the Virginia Historical Inventory Project (VHI)." The Bottom Line.
Francis, A. T. (1998). Software problems in library automation in India.
Goddard, H. C. (1971). An economic analysis of library benefits. The Library Quarterly, 41(3), 244-255.
Joteen Singh, R. K. (2010). A Library Software Model in 21st Century Network Environment. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 30(3).
King, J. L., & Schrems, E. L. (1978). Cost benefit analysis in information systems development and operation. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 10(1), 19-34.
Kumar, S. (2004). Automation of North Eastern Hill University: A Case Study of Tura Campus Library. ILA Bulletin, 4(3).
Murugan, K., Ravi, S., & Surianarayanan, S. Library Automation.
Nyström, V., & Sjögren, L. (2011). An evaluation of the benefits and value of libraries. Elsevier.
Pahuja, R. K., & Jhamb, R. K. (2008). Cost benefit analysis of ICT in libraries: a current scenario.
Raman Nair, R. (1994). Cost Benefit Analysis of College Library Automation. RILSAR Bulletin of Information Technology, 9(1-4), 4-8.
Singh, R. K. (2003). Status of Library Automation of Manipur University Library under INFLIBNET Programme.
Sinha, M. K., & Satpathy, K. C. (2004). Resource sharing and library networks in India. Herald of Library Science, 43(3/4), 243.
Sung, J. S., Whisler, J. A., & Sung, N. (2009). A cost-benefit analysis of a collections inventory project: A statistical analysis of inventory data from a medium
sized academic library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(4), 314-323. 18. Thapa., Neelam., Sahoo. (2006). Problems and prospects of automation in Madhya Pradesh technical aggressive edge libraries,” Journal of Libraggressive and Information Sciavailable, 31(1), 53-67.