The effect of plant growth regulators and urea on physico- chemical parameters of custard apple (Annona squamosa L.) cv. Sindhan

Authors

  • M. M. Masu Department of Horticulture, C. P. College of Agriculture, SDAU, Sardarkrushinagar, Dist. Banaskantha, Gujarat Author
  • L., R. Varma Department of Horticulture, C. P. College of Agriculture, SDAU, Sardarkrushinagar, Dist. Banaskantha, Gujarat Author

Keywords:

comprising, Block Design, seeds, experiment

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to maximize of yield with good quality of fruits in custard apple at Horticulture Instructional farm, Department of Horticulture, Chimanbhai Patel College of Agriculture, Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agri- cultural University, Sardarkrushinagar, Dist. Banaskantha, Gujarat during the year 2005 and 2006. The experiment involved fourteen treatments comprising of three levels each of NAA and GA, (50 ppm, 100 ppm and 150 ppm) and their combinations with 2% Urea, 2% Urea alone and Control. Seventeen year old custard apple plants of uniform growth and size were selected. Plants were planted at distance of 6 m x 6 m. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications. The combined effect of GA, ppm Urea 2% recorded significantly maximum fruit volume (208.33 ml), pulp weight (122.03 g). pulp: peel ratio (1.78), total soluble solids (27.67%), reducing sugars (18.93%), non-reducing sugars (3.91 %) and total sugars (22.87%) while significantly minimum number of seeds per fruit (29.21), peel weight (69.07g) and titrable acidity (0.081 %) as compared to control and all other treatments. The combined effect of GA, ppm + Urea 2 % proved to the best treatment for the improvement of fruit quality of custard apple.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, M. F. and Zardar. G. H. (2005) Effect of trunk gir- dling, flower thinning, GA, and ethephon appli- cation on quality characteristics in Grape cv. Perlette under temperate Kashmir Valley condi- tions. Indian J. Hort., 62 (3): 285-287.

Baghel, B. S., Sharma, R. K. and Nair, P. K. R. (1987) Efficacy of pre-flowering spray of urea and NAA on physi- cal standards of Mango fruits. Prog. Hort., 19(3- 4):231-234.

Bhati, B. S. and Yadav, P. K. (2004) Effec of foliar applica- tion of Urea and NAA on the yield parameters of Ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Gola. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 33 (3-4): 189-190. Brahmachari, V. S., Mandal, A. K., Rajesh Kumar and Rani. R. (1995) Effect of growth substances on fruit set and physiological characters of Sardar Guava. Recent Hort., 2(2): 127-131.

Chaudhari, A. S.; Singh, Moti and Singh, G. N. (1992) Effect of plant growth regulators on Loquat var. Herds Mammoth. Punjab Hort. J., 32 (1-4):99-102. Kaur, N., Monga, P. K., Thind, S. K., Thatai, S. K. and Vij. V. K. (2000). Effect of growth regulators on periodical fruit drop in kinnow man- darin. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 29 (1 & 2): 39-41. Kumari, R., Singh, J. R. and Gupta, O. P. (1975) Effect of growth regulators on fruit set, fruit drop and qual- ity of Sweet lime (Citrus limettioides Tanka). Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 4 (3/4): 123-129. Malik, R. P.; Ahlawat, V. P. and Nain, A. S. (2000) Effect of foliar spray of Urea and Zinc Sulphate on yield. and fruit quality of Kinnow- A mandar in hybrid". Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 29 (1-2): 37-38.

Pradhan, S. K., Bandyopadhyay, A., Mitra, S. K. and Sen. S. K. (1988). Effect of growth substances on fruit size, yield and quality of Banana var. Giant Gover-

M. M. Masu and L. R. Varma, Indian Journal of Arid Horticulture, 2008, Vol. 3 (1): 33-38

nor. Prog. Hort., 20(3-4): 326-330. Rani, R. and Brahmachari, V. S. (2004). Effect of growth

substances and calcium compounds on fruit re- tention, growth and yield of Amrapalli Mango. The Orrisa J. of Horticulture, 32(1): 15-18. Rema. J. and Sharma, V. P. (1991). Effect of plant growth regulators on yield and quality of Phalsa (Grewia subnaequalis). South Indian Hort., 39 (6): 327-

331.

Singh. J. N.. Rajput. C. B. S. and Prakash, S. (1991). Effect of urea spray on fruit retention and physico-chemi- cal composition of Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Amrapalli. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 20 (1-2): 35- 38. Singh, R., Godara, N. R. and Ahlawat, V. P. (2002). Qualita- tive attributes as affected by foliar sprays of nu- trients and growth regulators in Ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) cv. Umran. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 31(1-2):23-25.

Singh. R.. Godara, N. R., Singh, R. and Dahiya, S. S. (2001) Response of foliar application of growth regula- tors and nutrients in Ber (Ziziphus mauritiana

Lamk.) cv. Umran. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 30 (3 &

4): 161-164.

Singh, S. and Ahlawat. V. P. (1995) Physico-chemical at- tributes and mineral composition of Ber leaves as affected by foliar application of Urea and Zinc Sulphate. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 24(1):94-97. Singh, S., Kumar, P., Bramchari, V. S. and Singh, D. N. (1995) Effect of pre-harvest spray of GA, and ethtel on storage life of Mango cv. Amrapalli. Orrisa J. Hort., 23 (1-2): 112-118.

Verma, R. M. and Verke, D. C. (1973) Response to Gibberel- lin of Anab-E-Shahi Grapes. RKV Res. J., 1(2): 172- 175.

Yadav, S., Bhatia, S. K., Godara, R. K. and Rana, S. G. (2001) Effect of growth regulators on the yield and qual- ity of winter season Guava cv. L-49. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 30 (1-2): 1-2.

Published

2025-03-08