Comparative Efficacy of Homoeopathic and Antibiotic Growth Promoters on Performance of Commercial Broiler Chicken

Authors

  • Chintan B. Gameti Poultry Research Station, Veterinary & Animal Science Research & Extension Unit, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388110, Gujarat, India
  • Fulabhai P. Savaliya Poultry Research Station, Veterinary & Animal Science Research & Extension Unit, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388110, Gujarat, India
  • Avinash G. Mali Poultry Research Station, Veterinary & Animal Science Research & Extension Unit, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388110, Gujarat, India
  • Atul B. Patel Poultry Research Station, Veterinary & Animal Science Research & Extension Unit, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388110, Gujarat, India
  • Nikesh J. Bhagora Poultry Research Station, Veterinary & Animal Science Research & Extension Unit, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388110, Gujarat, India
  • Maqbul A. Shekh Animal Nutrition Research Station, Veterinary & Animal Science Research & Extension Unit, Kamdhenu University, Anand-388110, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.21.2.06

Keywords:

Antibiotic growth promoter, Homoeopathic growth promoter, Commercial broiler chicken, Growth performance.

Abstract

The application of antibiotics as growth promoter in poultry has been banned, hence alternative growth promoters are required to be used. One of them is Homoeopathic remedies. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of Homoeopathic and Antibiotic growth promoters on growth performance and feed efficiency of commercial broiler chicken. A total of 144 straight-run day-old commercial broiler chicks were randomly distributed to three treatments (T1, T2, T3). Each treatment consisted of eight replicates and in each replicate, six chicks were there, leading to 48 chicks per treatment. Birds in T1 (Control), received basal diet, while birds of T2 group were provided with Antibiotic Growth Promoters (AGP, Avilamycin, 10 g/100 kg) through feed and T3 group provided with Homoeopathic Growth Promoter (HGP, 2 mL/L) through drinking water. Up to 6 weeks of age, the body weight in birds of control group was significantly (p<0.05) higher as compared to AGP and HGP, which were at par with each other. The body weight gain of control group during the whole experimental period was significantly (p<0.05) higher than AGP, and that of HGP was intermediate between Control group and AGP. At the end of experiment, the feed consumption in Control group was significantly (p<0.05) higher compared to AGP and HGP, which were at par with each other. The FCRs of control and HGP were at par, and significantly (p<0.05) improved as compared to that of AGP. Livability was found better in control groupand HGP than AGP. The higher ROFC was obtained in the birds fed with control diet followed by AGP and HGP groups. The beneficial effect on performance was found better in the birds of control group. From the results, it can be concluded that there was no beneficial effect of Antibiotic as well as Homeopathic growth promoters on performance of commercial broiler chicken as compared to control.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalcaburio, R., Machado Filho, L.C.P., Honorato, L.A., & Nelton, A.Ã. (2009). Homoeopathic remedies in a semi-intensive alternative system of broiler production. International Journal of High Dilution Research, 8(26), 33-39.

Camerlink, I., Ellinger, L., Bakker, E.J., & Lantinga, E.A. (2010). Homeopathy as replacement to antibiotics in the case of Escherichia coli diarrhoea in neonatal piglets. Homeopathy, 99(01), 57-62.

Castanon, J.I.R. (2007). History of the use of antibiotic as growth promoters in European poultry feeds. Poultry Science, 86(11), 2466-2471.

Doehring, C., & Sundrum, A. (2016). Efficacy of homeopathy in livestock according to peer-reviewed publications from 1981 to 2014. Veterinary Record, 179(24), 628-628.

Galli, G.M., Boiago, M.M., Glombowsky, P., Marchiori, M.S., Bissacotti, B.F., Copetti, P.M., & da Silva, A.S. (2022). Addition of seaweed flour (Lithothamnium calcareum) combined with Homoeopathic feed for broiler chicken decreases the toxic effects caused by aflatoxin B1. Research, Society and Development, 11(11), e308111133305-e308111133305.

Hadipour, M.M., Habibi, G.H., Ghorashinejad, A., Olyaie, A., & Torki, M. (2011). Evaluation of the Homoeopathic remedies. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10(16), 2102-2105.

Madrewar, B.P. (2004). Poultry Homoeopathy. B. Jain Publishers, Lucknow, India.

Mathie, R.T. (2003). The research evidence base for homoeopathy: A fresh assessment of the literature. Homeopathy, 92(2), 84-91. Mathie, R.T., Baitson, E.S., Hansen, L., Elliott, M.F., & Hoare, J. (2010). Homeopathic prescribing for chronic conditions in feline and canine veterinary practice. Homeopathy, 99(04), 243-248. Rawat, D., Shah, R., Nepali, D.B., & Yadav, J.L. (2018). Effect of Homoeopathic medicine (alfalfa), methionine and lysine supplementation in low protein based diets on the performance of broiler chicken. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 6(2), 174-180.

Snedecor, G.W., & Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, India, pp. 445-446. Soumya, M.S., & Leena, N. (2018). Efficacy of alfalfa Q in enhancing the growth of chicken. Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle. net/123456789/2447.

Published

2025-02-26

How to Cite

B. Gameti, C., P. Savaliya, F., G. Mali, A., B. Patel, A., J. Bhagora, N., & A. Shekh, M. (2025). Comparative Efficacy of Homoeopathic and Antibiotic Growth Promoters on Performance of Commercial Broiler Chicken . Indian Journal of Veterinary Sciences and Biotechnology, 21(2), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijvsbt.21.2.06