Sperm Viability and Acrosome Integrity by Conventional and Fluorescent Staining Techniques Recovered in Three Different Buffers from Sheep Epididymal Tail- A Preliminary Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ijar.2025.46.02.6Keywords:
Acrosome integrity, conventional, fluorescent probes, recovery buffer, spermAbstract
The study was carried out to evaluate the accuracy of conventional and fluorescence based staining techniques for via bility and acrosome integrity of cauda epididymal spermatozoa in sheep. Spermatozoa were recovered from fresh epi didymis of testicles collected from local slaughter houses. Spermatozoa were recovered in seminal plasma (SP), Tyrode’s Albumin Lactate Pyruvate (TALP) and Tris Methyl Aminomethane (TRIS) buffer. The recovered spermatozoa were eval uated immediately and stored at 4 °C for subsequent evaluation up to 72 hours. Sperm viability and acrosome integrity were assessed at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours of recovery, using Eosin-Nigrosin and Carboxyfluorescein Diacetate (CFDA) plus Propidium Iodate (PI) for viability while Giemsa and Fluorescein Isothiocyanate-Peanut Agglutinin (FITC-PNA) plus PI for acrosome integrity. Upon general linear model statistics, the interactions viz; time x technique and buffer x time x technique were significant when TALP recovered spermatozoa were evaluated for viability and acrosome integrity, and when TRIS recovered spermatozoa were evaluated for acrosome integrity. By comparing the results at different periods, it was observed that the percentage values of both viability and acrosome integrity in SP recovered spermatozoa were significantly higher (p<0.05) when evaluated through conventional techniques. Compared to spermatozoa recovered in TALP and TRIS, those recovered in seminal plasma showed higher (p<0.05) sperm viability and acrosome integrity. Although the number of competent spermatozoa (possessing more percentage viability and acrosome integrity) were more in conventional staining methods, different classes of viable spermatozoa in all the replicates can be detected and better evaluated using fluorescent probes. In conclusion, fluorescent techniques proved more accurate and sensitive for evaluation of cauda epididymal spermatozoa in ram.
References
Almadaly, E., El-Kon, I., Heleil, B., Fattouh, E. S., Mukoujima, K., Ueda, T., and Murase, T. (2012). Methodological factors affecting the results of staining frozen–thawed fertile and subfertile Japanese Black bull spermatozoa for acrosomal status. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 136(1-2): 23-32.
Alvarez, M., Tamayo-Canul, J., Anel, E., Boixo, J. C., Mata Campuzano, M., Martinez-Pastor, F., Anel, L., and de Paz, P. (2012). Sperm concentration at freezing affects post-thaw quality and fertility of ram semen. Theriogenology, 77(6): 1111-1118.
Arndt-Jovin, D. J., and Jovin, T. M. (1989). Fluorescence labeling and microscopy of DNA. Meth. Cell Biol., 30: 417-448.
Bakst, M. R., Cecil, H. C., and Sexton, T. J. (1991). Modification of the ethidium bromide exclusion procedure for evaluation of turkey semen. Poult. Sci., 70(2): 366-370.
Bayyari, G. R., Cook, J. R., Harris Jr, G. C., Macy, L. B., Slavik, M. F., and Skeeles, J. K. (1990). Research note: The evaluation of chicken spermatozoa using fluorescent staining in a 96-well format. Poult. Sci., 69(9): 1602-1605.
Brito, L. F., Barth, A. D., Bilodeau-Goeseels, S., Panich, P. L., and Kastelic, J. P. (2003). Comparison of methods to evaluate the plasmalemma of bovine sperm and their relationship with in vitro fertilization rate. Theriogenology, 60(8): 1539-1551.
Carvalho, J. O., Sartori, R., Machado, G. M., Mourão, G. B., and Dode, M. A. N. (2010). Quality assessment of bovine cryopreserved sperm after sexing by flow cytometry and their use in in vitro embryo production. Theriogenology, 74(9): 1521-1530.
Cassinello, J., Abaigar, T., Gomendio, M., and Roldan, E. R. (1998). Characteristics of the semen of three endangered species of gazelles. J. Reprod. Fertil., 113(1): 35-45.
Celeghini, E. C. C., De Arruda, R. P., De Andrade, A. F. C., Nascimento, J., and Raphael, C. F. (2007). Practical techniques for bovine sperm simultaneous fluorimetric assessment of plasma, acrosomal and mitochondrial membranes. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 42(5): 479-488.
Centola, G. M., Mattox, J. H., Burde, S., and Leary, J. F. (1990). Assessment of the viability and acrosome status of fresh and frozen‐thawed human spermatozoa using single‐wavelength fluorescence microscopy. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 27(2): 130-135.
Cross, N. L., and Meizel, S. (1989). Methods for evaluating the acrosomal status of mammalian sperm. Biol. Reprod., 41(4): 635-641.
Cross, N. L., Morales, P., Overstreet, W., and Hanson, F. W. (1986). Two simple methods for detecting acrosome-reacted human sperm. Gamete Res., 15: 23-26.
Farah, O. I., Cuiling, L., Jiaojiao, W., and Huiping, Z. (2013). Use of fluorescent dyes for readily recognizing sperm damage. J. Reprod. Infertil., 14(3): 120.
Garner, D. L., Pinkel, D., Johnson, L. A., and Pace, M. M. (1986). Assessment of spermatozoal function using dual fluorescent staining and flow cytometric analyses. Biol. Reprod., 34(1): 127-138.
Garner, D. L., Thomas, C. A., Joerg, H. W., DeJarnette, J. M., and Marshall, C. E. (1997). Fluorometric assessments of mitochondrial function and viability in cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod., 57(6): 1401-1406.
Giwercman, A., Richthoff, J., Hjøllund, H., Bonde, J. P., Jepson, K., Frohm, B., and Spano, M. (2003). Correlation between sperm motility and sperm chromatin structure assay parameters. Fertil. Steril., 80(6): 1404-1412.
Hancock, J. L. (1951). A staining technique for the study of temperature-shock in semen. Nature, 167(4243): 323-324.
Harayama, H., Nishijima, K., Murase, T., Sakase, M., and Fukushima, M. (2010). Relationship of protein tyrosine phosphorylation state with tolerance to frozen storage and the potential to undergo cyclic AMP‐dependent hyperactivation in the spermatozoa of Japanese Black bulls. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 77(10): 910-921.
Harrison, R. A. P., and Vickers, S. E. (1990). Use of fluorescent probes to assess membrane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. Reprod., 88(1): 343-352.
Hossain, M. S., Johannisson, A., Wallgren, M., Nagy, S., Siqueira, A. P., and Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (2011). Flow cytometry for the assessment of animal sperm integrity and functionality: state of the art. Asian J. Androl., 13(3): 406.
Jankovičová, J., Simon, M., Antalíková, J., and Horovská, Ľ. (2008). Acrosomal and viability status of bovine spermatozoa evaluated by two staining methods. Acta Vet. Hung., 56(1): 133-138.
Kishida, K., Sakase, M., Minami, K., Arai, M. M., Syoji, R., Kohama, N., and Fukushima, M. (2015). Effects of acrosomal conditions of frozen-thawed spermatozoa on the results of artificial insemination in Japanese Black cattle. J. Reprod. Dev., 61(6): 519-524.
Kovacs, A., and Foote, R. H. (1992). Viability and acrosome staining of bull, boar and rabbit spermatozoa. Biotech. Histochem., 67(3): 119-124.
Lewis, M., Paro, S. E., Borriello, R., Simon, L., Robinson, L., Dincer, L., and Maccarrone, M. (2012). Long‐term use of HU210 adversely affects spermatogenesis in rats by modulating the endocannabinoid system. Int. J. Androl., 35(5): 731-740.
Lichtman, J. W., and Conchello, J. A. (2005). Fluorescence microscopy. Nat. Methods, 2(12): 910-919.
Lone, F. A., Islam, R., Khan, M. Z., and Sofi, K. A. (2012). Effect of different egg yolk‐based extenders on the quality of ovine cauda epididymal spermatozoa during storage at 4°C. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 47(2): 257-262.
Mortimer, D., Shu, M. A., and Tan, R. (1986). Standardization and quality control of sperm concentration and sperm motility counts in semen analysis. Hum. Reprod., 1(5): 299-303.
Panmei, A., Gupta, A. K., Shivahre, P. R., Bhakat, M., and Upadhyay, A. (2015). Conventional and fluorescent based semen quality assessment in Karan Fries bulls. Vet. World, 8(10): 1243.
Pena, F. J. (2018). Multiparametric flow cytometry: a relevant tool for sperm function evaluation. Anim. Reprod., 12(3): 351-355.
Pintado, B., De La Fuente, J., and Roldan, E. R. (2000). Permeability of boar and bull spermatozoa to the nucleic acid stains Propidium iodide or Hoechst 33258, or to eosin: accuracy in the assessment of cell viability. J. Reprod. Fertil., 118(1): 145-152.
Rajabi-Toustani, R., Akter, Q. S., Almadaly, E. A., Hoshino, Y., Adachi, H., Mukoujima, K., and Murase, T. (2019). Methodological improvement of fluorescein isothiocyanate peanut agglutinin (FITC-PNA) acrosomal integrity staining for frozen-thawed Japanese Black bull spermatozoa. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 81(5): 694-702.
Rodríguez‐Martínez, H. (2006). Can we increase the estimated value of semen assessment? Reprod. Domest. Anim., 41: 2-10.
Sandeep, K. (2010). Methylation profile of H19 gene in relation to fertility status of crossbred bulls. M.V.Sc Thesis, NDRI (Deemed University), Karnal, Haryana, India.
Santos, I. W., Nobrega Jr, J. E., Ilha, G. F., Rovani, M. T., De Cesaro, M. P., Gasperin, B. G., and Goncalves, P. B. D. (2015). Technique to simultaneously evaluate ram sperm morphology, acrosome and membrane integrity. Anim. Reprod., 12(4): 884-889.
Sapanidou, V., Taitzoglou, I., Tsakmakidis, Ι., Kourtzelis, I., Fletouris, D., Theodoridis, A., and Tsantarliotis, M. (2015). Antioxidant effect of crocin on bovine sperm quality and in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology, 84(8): 1273-1282.
Shivhare, P. R., Gupta, A. K., Panmei, A., Yadav, B. R., Bhakat, M., Mohanty, T. K., and Singh, S. (2015). Relationship of conventional and fluorescent microscopic technique to assess in vitro semen quality status of Murrah buffalo males. Iran. J. Vet. Res., 16(4): 363.
Siciliano, L., Marcianò, V., and Carpino, A. (2008). Prostasome-like vesicles stimulate acrosome reaction of pig spermatozoa. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol., 6: 1-7.
Sills, E. S., Fryman, J. T., Perloe, M., Michels, K. B., and Tucker, M. J. (2004). Chromatin fluorescence characteristics and standard semen analysis parameters: correlations observed in andrology testing among 136 males referred for infertility evaluation. J. Obstet. and Gynaecol., 24(1): 74-77.
Singh, P. P., Dar, R. A., Lone, F. A., Bhat, G. R., and Abdullah, M. (2024). Homologous seminal plasma efficiently activates epididymal tail sperm compared to traditional tris buffer and sperm-TALP in sheep. Discover Anim., 1(1): 2.
Singh, R. K., Kumaresan, A., Chhillar, S., Rajak, S. K., Tripathi, U. K., Nayak, S., and Malhotra, R. (2016). Identification of suitable combinations of in vitro sperm function tests for the prediction of fertility in buffalo bulls. Theriogenology, 86: 2263–2271.
Singh, S. (2014). Selected management interventions and biostimulation to augment libido and sperm production in Sahiwal bulls (Doctoral dissertation, NDRI, Karnal).
Standerholen, F. B., Myromslien, F. D., Kommisrud, E., Ropstad, E., and Waterhouse, K. E. (2014). Comparison of electronic volume and forward scatter principles of cell selection using flow cytometry for the evaluation of acrosome and plasma membrane integrity of bull spermatozoa. Cytom. A., 85(8): 719-728.
Tamuli, M. K., and Watson, P. F. (1994). Use of a simple staining technique to distinguish acrosomal changes in the live sperm sub-population. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 35(3-4): 247-254.
Vijetha, B. T. (2011). Pedigree analysis of semen quality and its relationship with fertility in Karan Fries crossbred bulls (Doctoral dissertation, NDRI, Karnal).
Wells, M. E., and Awa, O. A. (1970). New technique for assessing acrosomal characteristics of spermatozoa. J. Dairy Sci., 53(2): 227-232.
Yaniz, J. L., Palacín, I., Vicente-Fiel, S., Gosalvez, J., López Fernández, C., and Santolaria, P. (2013). Evaluation of a commercial kit based on acridine orange/propidium iodide to assess the plasma membrane integrity of ram sperm. Span. J. Agric. Res., 11(2): 362-365.
